Want insights and updates from us?
- Copyright © 2023 Core Integrity
- Privacy Policy
The ASIC v Terracom Limited case is a landmark legal battle currently unfolding in the Federal Court of Australia. This case represents the first instance where the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has initiated proceedings to enforce private sector whistleblower protections under the Corporations Act. The case involves TerraCom Limited, a coal producer based in Queensland, and several of its senior executives.
The primary parties in this case, as identified in relevant documents, are TerraCom Limited, its managing director Daniel McCarthy, chief commercial officer Nathan Boom, former Chair Wallace King, and former director and Deputy Chair Craig Ransley. ASIC, the regulatory body responsible for enforcing company and financial services laws to protect consumers, investors, and creditors, is the plaintiff in this case.
The allegations centre around whistleblowers claims made by a former employee of TerraCom. The whistleblower alleged that TerraCom had been involved in the falsification of coal quality results. ASIC alleges in court documents that TerraCom and its senior executives engaged in conduct that harmed the whistleblower, including making false or misleading statements to the ASX and publishing an open letter to shareholders denying the whistleblower’s allegations.
ASIC initiated civil penalty proceedings against TerraCom and its executives to enforce the whistleblower protections under the Corporations Act. The specific provisions alleged to have been breached include sections 1317AC and 1317AD, which protect whistleblowers from detrimental conduct and ensure their disclosures are handled appropriately. According to reports, ASIC is seeking declarations of contravention, pecuniary penalties, disqualification orders and costs.
The case has seen several important court dates:
The case is still ongoing, and the date for the first case management hearing is yet to be scheduled by the Court. At this point, no final orders relating to the declarations that ASIC are seeking have been made.
The next steps in this case will likely involve further court hearings to address the allegations and determine whether there have been any breaches, and if there have been, what the appropriate penalties and remedies should be. It is apparent based on reports that ASIC will continue to pursue its claims against TerraCom and its executives, seeking to enforce the whistleblower protections under the Corporations Act.
The key provisions of the Corporations Act alleged to have been breached include:
ASIC claims these provisions were breached due to the alleged falsification of coal quality results and the subsequent detrimental conduct towards the whistleblower.
To avoid similar accusations and allegations being presented, organisations bound by the Corporations Act’s whistleblower provisions should ensure that they have in place:
By taking these steps, organisations can create a safer and more transparent work environment, ensuring compliance with legal requirements and protecting whistleblowers.